On 9 Sep 2003 22:43:25 -0700, mikegordge@no-spam (Michael Gordge)
wrote:
>Brian Dooley <brian-d@no-spam> wrote in message news:<6grnlvgn1ipbgogdrrvflir5o1c5eovqm6@no-spam>...
>> On Sun, 07 Sep 2003 13:10:43 +1200, Enkidu <enkidu@no-spam>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >On 6 Sep 2003 14:55:29 -0700, mikegordge@no-spam (Michael Gordge)
>> >wrote:
>>
>>
>> >>*Facts* ARE absolute Cliff, make NO mistake about it.
>> >>
>>
>> Battle of Hastings, 14 oct, 1066.
>>
>> Is that a fact?
>
>I have seen nothing that contradicts that date and a fact is a fact if
>there is nothing known that contradicts it.
>
It is a fact that different countries used different calendars. It is
also true that at various times various calendars got aligned with
other calendars, got revised and changed. I think that there is a
significant chance that they got the date wrong.
I note that YOU consider it a fact because YOU haven't seen anything
that contradicts it. How egotistical!
>
>Is it an absolute fact that your name really is Brian Dooley, Brian?
>
>I wonder if it is an absolute "fact" that Cliff's name really is
>Cliff.
>
People call me various things like "Dad", and "Grandad", and "Uncle
Cliff", and sometimes "'ere you!". I call myself Enkidu here. So is it
an absolute fact that my name is Cliff? Or is it Heathcliff (swoon) or
is it Clifford (the big red ...)? As the playwright said "What's in a
name? That which we call a rose by any other name would smell as
sweet".
>
>Gosh hasn't Mike Parsons lost what little credibility he had left
>thinking for one second that Cliff was intelliigent?
>
You've really got a thing about this, haven't you?
Cheers,
Cliff
--
The complete lack of evidence is the surest sign
that the conspiracy is working.
