In article <ef47a19d.0309092143.4e50084f@no-spam>,
mikegordge@no-spam says...
> Brian Dooley <brian-d@no-spam> wrote in message news:
> > Battle of Hastings, 14 oct, 1066.
> > Is that a fact?
> I have seen nothing that contradicts that date and a fact is a fact if
> there is nothing known that contradicts it.
What happens if something was discovered in the future to contradict
it? Would it still be a fact?
--Peter Metcalfe
