On Tue, 09 Sep 2003 16:27:15 +1300, Brian Dooley
<brian-d@no-spam> wrote:
>On Sun, 07 Sep 2003 13:10:43 +1200, Enkidu <enkidu@no-spam>
>wrote:
>
>>On 6 Sep 2003 14:55:29 -0700, mikegordge@no-spam (Michael Gordge)
>>wrote:
>
>
>>>*Facts* ARE absolute Cliff, make NO mistake about it.
>>>
>
>Battle of Hastings, 14 oct, 1066.
>
>Is that a fact?
>
http://www.historicalfact.com/
What a cool site!
eg "The average pair of human male testicles contains enough energy to
light the town of Wigan for four hours."
You get a different one every time you visit.
"Historical fact" is an oxymoron, like "Military intelligence"
Cheers,
Cliff
--
The complete lack of evidence is the surest sign
that the conspiracy is working.
Enkidu <enkidu@no-spam> wrote in message news:<p6brlvs7uks0eqrs9ue03juetpe511tt86@no-spam>...
> On Tue, 09 Sep 2003 16:27:15 +1300, Brian Dooley
> <brian-d@no-spam> wrote:
>
> >On Sun, 07 Sep 2003 13:10:43 +1200, Enkidu <enkidu@no-spam>
> >wrote:
> >
> >>On 6 Sep 2003 14:55:29 -0700, mikegordge@no-spam (Michael Gordge)
> >>wrote:
> >
> >
> >>>*Facts* ARE absolute Cliff, make NO mistake about it.
> >>>
> >
> >Battle of Hastings, 14 oct, 1066.
> >
> >Is that a fact?
> >
> http://www.historicalfact.com/
Cliff signs off with
>
> The complete lack of evidence is the surest sign
> that the conspiracy is working.
What is "evidence" given that YOU claim facts can never be facts?