On Fri, 08 Aug 2003 16:06:50 GMT, ByTor <ByTor@no-spam>
wrote:
>In article <ps27jv0o88ucdefaq9dmmvr0oab7pffs4p@no-spam>, ob110ob@no-spam
>says... while attaching C4 explosives to computer and foaming at the
>mouth!
>
>> Oh come off it...
>
>Curious question for ya.....I've basically followed your thread.
>
>What type of "security" would you propose for this "special" school?
>Who will foot the bill?
>I mean if they are targeted as much as is stated(which I'm not
>disputing), would'nt special security be an issue?......
That's another question entirely since the "targeting" under
discussion is of a kind that exists when gays are in the public
environment that this is supposed to correct. As someone else
here said, being located in Greenwich Village, there's an
extremely low expectation of outsider attacks. So no, I don't
see any reason to think that special security is needed.
Obwon
O[]ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ[]O
"Those who can make you believe absurdities can
make you commit atrocities."
- Voltaire
O[]ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ[]O
In article <dr0fjv4fvcjqorotg4r48ro6f5oafsbvt9@no-spam>, ob110ob@no-spam
says...
> On Fri, 08 Aug 2003 16:06:50 GMT, ByTor <ByTor@no-spam>
> wrote:
>
> >In article <ps27jv0o88ucdefaq9dmmvr0oab7pffs4p@no-spam>, ob110ob@no-spam
> >says... while attaching C4 explosives to computer and foaming at the
> >mouth!
> >
> >> Oh come off it...
> >
> >Curious question for ya.....I've basically followed your thread.
> >
> >What type of "security" would you propose for this "special" school?
> >Who will foot the bill?
> >I mean if they are targeted as much as is stated(which I'm not
> >disputing), would'nt special security be an issue?......
>
> That's another question entirely since the "targeting" under
> discussion is of a kind that exists when gays are in the public
> environment that this is supposed to correct. As someone else
> here said, being located in Greenwich Village, there's an
> extremely low expectation of outsider attacks. So no, I don't
> see any reason to think that special security is needed.
Hmmmmm, interesting, I actually think it would be a part, not seperate,
question of the issue. Public environment? Why not make it a private
school than? Why is it a "public" responsibility? I mean don't get me
wrong, education is every students right, it is our systems obligation
to comply and that is already being done now without seperatism.
1) What about the E.O.E (Equal Opportunity Employment) will only Gay
teachers, Janitors, Principals, etc., only be hired?
2) What about non-gay students, will they be allowed to attend?
3) Will non-gay students be teased & attacked? How will that be
confronted? Or does gay children not exhibit that type of behavior?
After all I would think that if the above first two questions are
answered yes would that not be in fact "reverse discrimination?" I mean
after all the non-gay population is part of the issue no?
I would think the entire spectrum is to be looked at, not seperating the
"different" issues. All of these will also fall under the umbrella of
approaching the undertaking of a project like this. It appears to me
that this issue is more of a political issue/statement and those
motivations should be questioned first. When it comes to political
involvement sometimes people tend to forget the welfare of the people
that may be affected because they have succumbed to their own personal
statements and only regard their own motivations. Isn't that basically
how our political arena works, screw the people, lets see where we can
benefit. Very blinding and scary isn't it.........
Obwon <ob110ob@no-spam> wrote in message news:<dr0fjv4fvcjqorotg4r48ro6f5oafsbvt9@no-spam>...
> On Fri, 08 Aug 2003 16:06:50 GMT, ByTor <ByTor@no-spam>
> wrote:
>
> >In article <ps27jv0o88ucdefaq9dmmvr0oab7pffs4p@no-spam>, ob110ob@no-spam
> >says... while attaching C4 explosives to computer and foaming at the
> >mouth!
> >
> >> Oh come off it...
> >
> >Curious question for ya.....I've basically followed your thread.
> >
> >What type of "security" would you propose for this "special" school?
> >Who will foot the bill?
> >I mean if they are targeted as much as is stated(which I'm not
> >disputing), would'nt special security be an issue?......
>
> That's another question entirely since the "targeting" under
> discussion is of a kind that exists when gays are in the public
> environment that this is supposed to correct. As someone else
> here said, being located in Greenwich Village, there's an
> extremely low expectation of outsider attacks. So no, I don't
> see any reason to think that special security is needed.
That's like saying the risk of terrorist attacks against Americans is
low because they are in America.
"If you see someone you don't know, taking a crop-duster that isn't
his, report him." - King Bush
"Hey, that guy's purse doesn't match his pumps! Report him!" - Alice
(formerly known as Fred) from GV
