"Obwon" <ob110ob@no-spam> wrote in message
news:uuj4jvg1tmv0gsd7pu6lcb49a8ia7lavo6@no-spam
>
> No, what is amazing however, is the way you try to flip flop
> away from the issues you raise in the attempt to bolster your
> failing positions. Try this: After saying that you needed the
> statistical evidence that would justify this measure, agreeing
> that if it exists then taking remedial measures is sound. You
> then attempt to define my "ignoring the middle" by constructing
> an argument that is even less sound.
>
> You would want us to believe that there is a possibility that
> abuse against gays might be moderate and/or restrained, and that
> might make "separate but equal" an overkill solution. Haw Haw
> Haw! Perhaps women can get "partially pregnant" too, huh?
>
> Obwon
yes, that is EXACTLY my point. of course there is some abuse against gays in
public schools.
whether that justifies segregation is another issue entirely.
and the fact that you would support such a program without even a cursory
knowledge of exactly how bad the problem is, is very telling in regards to
your knee jerk acceptance of segregation on mere sentiment.
whit
> O[]ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ[]O
> "Those who can make you believe absurdities can
> make you commit atrocities."
> - Voltaire
> O[]ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ[]O
