On Sun, 23 Sep 2007 15:00:18 -0500, Walt Farrell <wfarrell@no-spam> wrote:
>> FYI... taking additional extents with SYSEXEC would NOT cause this problem.
>
>Even with the default of EXECUTIL EXECDD(NOCLOSE) in effect?
Yes. Even though that is the default, I did purposely set it and tested
to make sure.
Mark
--
Mark Zelden
Sr. Software and Systems Architect - z/OS Team Lead
Zurich North America / Farmers Insurance Group - ZFUS G-ITO
mailto:mark.zelden@no-spam
z/OS and OS390 expert at http://searchDataCenter.com/ateExperts/
Systems Programming expert at http://expertanswercenter.techtarget.com/
Mark's MVS Utilities: http://home.flash.net/~mzelden/mvsutil.html
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to listserv@no-spam with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
