AZ POLITICS 1839 DEMOCRATS IN SOUTH SEEN AS OUT OF TOUCH GAY LIBERAL
From: cornman4696@no-spam (Liberals Fear Truth)
Subject: DemocRATs in South seen as out of touch, gay, liberal!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Date: 10 Feb 2004 16:35:23 -0800


DemocRATs in South seen as out of touch, gay, liberal!

The democRAT party is losing it in the South. Last Tuesdays elections made that crystal clear. News channels are once again beginning to speak of the 'Solid South' - only this time it's not democRAT. Does any democRAT have a chance in the Southland?

Probably not. Everywhere you go, anyone you talk to, being seen as a democRAT just isn't something you'd want to be open about any more.
The party has become synonymous with the nasty ways of folk in big Northen cities who were given a slightly different understanding of the birds and bees by their parents. There is a serious opening now for another party to rise up and fill the void, because democRATs are no longer an alternative, their credibility is on the point of collapse, but it seems like there should be more than just one other choice for normal people to choose from.

Just look at Candidate Howeard Dean fumbling all over himself with the Confederate flag issue. Uh, yeah, I think I'm gonna support Dean now,
that he's come out as a good ol' boy who supports us southren folk. Wheres my Dean bumper sticker, I wanna put it right next to my confedrate flag sticker. Luckily, my car is armor plated with bulletproof glass...! Seriously, who does this guy think he is? Is he trying to win the suport of that vast cache of voters in the 'Gay Rednecks for Dean' bloc?

Of the other 9 candidates, not one has a platform that hasn't been approved and written by the militant homosexual lobby. Not one is against putting perverts in the military. Excuse me, but didn't America already go through this exact same ordeal? When is this national nightmare sponsored by 1% of the dregs of society ever going to be over?? We Southerners aren't that technologically illiterate, we can log into the Villiage Voice website from right here in our homes with our mint juleps, and read all about how their nancy-boy editor has dropped Dean like a hot tater and is now simply drooling all over General Clarke, the latest "stealth" candidate of the gay military crowd. It might have been possible in 1992 when there were no websites, to say one thing up north and another down south. But this is 2003, and we-all 're wise to just about ever'thang now.

If democRAT party cannot clean itself up and shake this albatross around its neck, we ain't never comin back. I would like to see this happen, and see them stop being a vehicle for perverts and the lowest of the low, so there will be a real choice again. Then the perverts will just have to try something else. Yes all Americans have rights,
but that was never meant to be abused by these pedophiles and freaks to try and take away everyone else's rights, including our right to resist them and raise our families straight. They are crooked criminals, and unwelcome here, and in the South they will always be seen as such.
With the bullhorn megaphone they were handed shortly after Clintons election, the militant, anti-Family, Orientationally Challenged lobby immediately began to trumpet about how they would henceforth no longer seen as a 'live wire' that 'electrocuted' any candidate who touched them. I'm sorry to burst their bubble, but they have been deluding themselves. Americans feel no differently now than ever. We still sense they are against our families, and so, perfectly naturally, we are still just as much against their media intrusion into our lives.
That's instinct. American society has always worked on the principle 'you sow what you reap'. Ever since Clinton was elected, it pathetically gave them a false sense of hope that they could now suddenly start sowing one thing, and reaping another. No. Look again.
What are they sowing? Exactly, the same thing they are reaping.

Clinton's first victory against Bush and Perot was owed to a lot of naive folk who would never have put him in office if they knew what he stood for. His second election, he ran against Dole and Perot for one thing, and also did his best to confuse voters and make it look like 'gays in the military' was really the GOP's idea all along... That's not touching the live wire, that's trying to hide it with the skeletons you-know-where! It was only after he became a lame duck that he could safely rip off the masquerade and spend the rest of his political time almost exclusively in the company of various militant homosexual groups (with the exception of Miss Lewinsky)... You can't start boasting about touching a live wire and changing public perception, unless you are up front with the voters about what you really stand for... At least the current crop of candidates are a little more up front about their 'persuasions', but we will see if they fare any better than Gore next year. Don't count on it. In the meantime, our biggest challenge we're working on now is figuring out just how 99% of us are gonna get that bullhorn out of the hands of that nasty 1%...! All we know is that it WILL be done one way or t'other, and just hope it don't have to get too messy!!