On Sun, 18 Jan 2004 09:06:55 +1000, Craig Welch <craig@no-spam> wrote:
>On Mon, 12 Jan 2004 11:26:05 +1100, Kristine <krissy_65@no-spam>
>wrote:
>
>>>>> >>>That's right. Both bush and cheney have convictions for the deadly
>>>>> >>>crime of drunk driving. And both the dems and the media give them a
>>>>> >>>free ride on it.
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >>Drunk driving is not a deadly crime.
>>>>> >
>>>>> >Whaaaa???
>>>>>
>>>>> Killing people whilst driving drunk is a deadly crime.
>>>>>
>>>>> Many people drive whilst drunk and don't kill anyone.
>>>
>>>>only by sheer luck that they didn't hit and kill anyone.
>>>
>>>Must be a lot of lucky people out there. On any given night, there
>>>are tens of thousands of drivers who are over the legal limit.
>>
>>And that makes it allright and legal???
>
>No, driving over the legal limit is not legal. That's why I used the
>phrase 'legal limit'. As for 'allright', it's often so. The legal
>limit is set ridiculously low.
Actually, you said "Drunk driving is not a deadly crime."
Then you said "Killing people whilst driving drunk is a deadly crime." and "Many people drive whilst
drunk and don't kill anyone."
Don't confusse the issue. You're an idiot.
K ~ thinks the BAL should be ZERO! 8^))