On 3 Jan 2004 15:54:41 -0800, arnold_wolfcastle_gupta@no-spam
(Arnold Wolfcaste) wrote:
>Steve Irwin needs
>to crawl back in his gin bottle and the police should take his
>children away from him. He is a dangerous loony.
Arnold. Seriously. Stop taking the fucktard pills.
In article <3ff7489f$0$18692$afc38c87@no-spam>,
"The Face In The Mirror" <bjkaus@no-spam> wrote:
>
> bb wrote in message ...
> >On 3 Jan 2004 11:51:45 -0800, arnold_wolfcastle_gupta@no-spam
> >(Arnold Wolfcaste) wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Do most drunken Aussies do this or is Irwin also a pedophile like Michael
> Jackson?
> >
> >
> >
> >Yes, he was wrong to do it.
> >
> >But you're clearly a fucking idiot.
> >
> >Hope this helps, fucktard. Have fun playing in your own excrement.
>
> you lnow what.. i don't think he was wrong to do it.. so the kid may have
> been yound butt the video footage shows the kid is clearly out of harms way,
> and i recall steve saying his parents did the same to him.
> besides that he would be a BAD parent if he didn't do it. after all we don't
> have crocs in the bbackyard (i hope) getting used to the crocs should be
> part of living there (but not so used to them that the kid trys to pet them
> or something - teach it some halthy respect)
> in short - no ordinary backyard = no ordinary child rasing situatoion
It is true, in Australia we all have crocks in our backyyard, but we
usually start crock training when we are toddlers, not when we are
babies.
In article <bt76ua$3v4du$4@no-spam>,
steven x brown <stevenxbrown@no-spam> wrote:
> Arnold Wolfcaste wrote:
>
> > http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/040102/482/lon82301022344
> >
> > Do most drunken Aussies do this or is Irwin also a pedophile like Michael
> > Jackson?
>
> Steve Irwin is great fun. Why do you hate him so much? Can you
> honestly say you've never done anything stupid? Only difference is,
> he had cameras there to record his act of stupidity.
There's being stupid and then there's child abuse and neglect.
In article <LWJJb.665$FD6.23977@no-spam>,
"Iggy" <ig0610(nospam)@no-spam> wrote:
>
> "Rebel without a Kenton" <kobNOSPAMPLEASEE@no-spam> wrote in message
> news:kobNOSPAMPLEASEE-84AC42.12111104012004@no-spam
> > In article <bt76ua$3v4du$4@no-spam>,
> > steven x brown <stevenxbrown@no-spam> wrote:
> >
> > > Arnold Wolfcaste wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/040102/482/lon82301022344
> > > >
> > > > Do most drunken Aussies do this or is Irwin also a pedophile like
> Michael
> > > > Jackson?
> > >
> > > Steve Irwin is great fun. Why do you hate him so much? Can you
> > > honestly say you've never done anything stupid? Only difference is,
> > > he had cameras there to record his act of stupidity.
> >
> > There's being stupid and then there's child abuse and neglect.
>
> And what Steve Irwin did was stupid, not a case of child abuse and neglect.
It was essentially a publicity stunt that backfired, like the Kate
Langbrook incident on the panel last year.
it just raises the issue that if that's what he does with his kid when
cameras are around, what does he do when they're off ?
In article <wyUJb.923$FD6.32330@no-spam>,
"Tourette's" <emily_patt@no-spam> wrote:
>
> "Iggy" <ig0610(nospam)@no-spam> wrote in message
> news:_4QJb.851$FD6.28517@no-spam
>
> > And round two begins.....
>
> I'm staying out of this one Iggy. You'll never persuade the
> anal brigade in here of anything, and if you try you'll just
> be branded and abused. *sigh*
well yeah, but that's kinda the point of usenet.
In article <kxUJb.922$FD6.32209@no-spam>,
"Tourette's" <emily_patt@no-spam> wrote:
>
> "Rebel without a Kenton" <kobNOSPAMPLEASEE@no-spam> wrote in message
> news:kobNOSPAMPLEASEE-6FCE95.15195304012004@no-spam
>
> > > And what Steve Irwin did was stupid, not a case of child abuse and
> neglect.
> > It was essentially a publicity stunt that backfired, like the Kate
> > Langbrook incident on the panel last year.
>
> Steve Irwin took a baby near a crocodile.
> Kate Langbroek took a baby near a *breast*
> How you can compare the two has me fucking bewildered.
Both examples of child exploitation, parents using their kids to
generate publicity.
In article <YN_Jb.963$FD6.34112@no-spam>,
"Iggy" <ig0610(nospam)@no-spam> wrote:
>
> "Tourette's" <emily_patt@no-spam> wrote in message
> news:wyUJb.923$FD6.32330@no-spam
> >
> > "Iggy" <ig0610(nospam)@no-spam> wrote in message
> > news:_4QJb.851$FD6.28517@no-spam
> >
> > > And round two begins.....
> >
> > I'm staying out of this one Iggy. You'll never persuade the
> > anal brigade in here of anything, and if you try you'll just
> > be branded and abused. *sigh*
>
> Oh, I'm not getting into the Kate debate either. That's been done.
So has the Jackson dangle incident, but that keeps resurfacing.
In article <Vg8Mb.575$Gf3.26382@no-spam>,
"RMG" <rmgtakeoutthespam@no-spam> wrote:
>
> "amstereo" <amstereo@no-spam> wrote in message
> news:3ffeb4a8$0$27240$afc38c87@no-spam
> > You have kids? you let them sit in the front seat of the car?
> > The design of a car calles for anyone who can't look over the dash to sit
> in
> > the back because the force of airbags can snap a kids neck and seatbealts
> > are optimised for adults.
> >
> > Everyone has different ways of doing things, this is his. leave the guy
> > alone. He was brought up the same way, didn't kill him, he's done it with
> > both kids. Theres worse things that could happen.
>
> Too true.
> And isn't it noticible that everybody seems to become an expert on how other
> people should raise children?
Yes, especially those without children themselves.
