On 3 Jan 2004 11:51:45 -0800, arnold_wolfcastle_gupta@no-spam
(Arnold Wolfcaste) wrote:
>Do most drunken Aussies do this or is Irwin also a pedophile like Michael Jackson?
Yes, he was wrong to do it.
But you're clearly a fucking idiot.
Hope this helps, fucktard. Have fun playing in your own excrement.
On Sun, 4 Jan 2004 12:53:53 +1000, "randum_proser" <spam@no-spam>
wrote:
>
>"Arnold Wolfcaste" <arnold_wolfcastle_gupta@no-spam> wrote in message
>news:76bdb568.0401031151.5f9daf2e@no-spam
>> http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/040102/482/lon82301022344
>>
>> Do most drunken Aussies do this or is Irwin also a pedophile like Michael
>Jackson?
>
>
>Do you have any reason to believe that Erwin was not in control of
>situation, or that, at any time, the child was in danger?
>
>These were *his* crocs at *his* zoo.
Sigfrid & Roys Tigers were also their Tigers. They turned on them and
almost killed one.
As has been said many times, no matter how sure you are, you can never
be 100% sure what animals are going to do.
With Steve saying there was no chance of anything happening, that just
shows he doesn't know as much about crocodiles as he tells everyone he
does.
>if she had to genuinely feed her baby, and not the publicity department, she
>would have left the room for privacy.
Why?
What's wrong with feeding your baby on TV, in public, etc?
On 3 Jan 2004 11:51:45 -0800, arnold_wolfcastle_gupta@no-spam
(Arnold Wolfcaste) wrote:
>http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/040102/482/lon82301022344
>
>Do most drunken Aussies do this or is Irwin also a pedophile like Michael Jackson?
If you want child endangerment, let's talk about how you love to throw
your kid in the car and then drive 90 mph while roaring drunk.
>Both examples of child exploitation, parents using their kids to
>generate publicity.
Kate was doing it to feed her baby, not publicity. It needed feeding
so was she supposed to just ignore the baby? That would be a disgrace
if she didn't feed the baby when it needed to be.
Irwin was doing it to generate publicity.
On Sun, 4 Jan 2004 19:55:57 -0700, "** Vox Dei ©" <vox@no-spam>
wrote:
>Laura Bush-Murderess in our WH wrote:
>> On 4 Jan 2004 13:54:06 -0800, arnold_wolfcastle_gupta@no-spam
>> (Arnold Wolfcaste) wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Crocs can move about 39 feet in less than a second. They are
>>> incredibly fast and faster & meaner than alligators. There is no way
>>> fat stupid Steve could have saved himself or the baby if that croc
>>> moved on him. He has no special skill except a tiny brain.
>>
>> Talking about drunks, every day kids are killed and maimed by drunk
>> drivers but you repugs don't give a damn about that!!
>
>Cause the Repugs like GW Bu$h are the one's doing the killing.
That's right. Both bush and cheney have convictions for the deadly
crime of drunk driving. And both the dems and the media give them a
free ride on it.
On Mon, 05 Jan 2004 09:35:09 -0700, Laura Bush-Murderess in our WH
<> wrote:
>That's right. Both bush and cheney have convictions for the deadly
>crime of drunk driving. And both the dems and the media give them a
>free ride on it.
Drunk driving is not a deadly crime.
On Tue, 06 Jan 2004 23:00:08 +1000, Craig Welch <craig@no-spam> wrote:
>On Mon, 05 Jan 2004 09:35:09 -0700, Laura Bush-Murderess in our WH
><> wrote:
>
>>That's right. Both bush and cheney have convictions for the deadly
>>crime of drunk driving. And both the dems and the media give them a
>>free ride on it.
>
>Drunk driving is not a deadly crime.
Whaaaa???
K
