News-
"In the wake of the US and British bombing of Iraq, investigative
film maker Gwynne Roberts finds evidence that suggests that Iraq
may already have developed its own nuclear weapons."
Wow....
Pretty scary report, isn't it?
And can you guess where it aired?
On the BBC, on March 3, 2001.
Marxist Bush hating hypocrites caught out again...
======================================
Saddam's bomb
Friday, 2 March, 2001, 23:52 GMT
Leone described himself as an engineer who was a member of the
Iraqi Atomic Energy Commission - and a senior official in the
secret Iraqi nuclear programme.
To prove his expertise, Leone worked throughout the night drawing
detailed diagrams of nuclear weapons in his hotel room.
He said it worked on the principle of the Hiroshima-type bomb, in
which high explosives drive pieces of highly enriched uranium
together at high velocity. This triggers a nuclear explosion.
Then Leone made another staggering claim - that Iraq had actually
conducted a nuclear test before the Gulf War.
"It was carried out at 1030 on 19 September 1989 at an
underground site 150 kilometres south-west of Baghdad," he said.
"Saddam had threatened us with the death penalty if we told
anybody about it."
The location was a militarised zone on the far shore of Lake
Rezzaza, which used to be a tourist area. There is a natural
tunnel there which leads to a large cavern under the lake.
"We went to a lot of trouble to conceal the test from the eyes of
the outside world," said . "The Russians supplied us with a table
listing US satellite movements. They were always helping us."
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/correspondent/1191203.stm
--
Redbaiter
In the leftist's lexicon, the lowest of the low
Micheal Wilson says...
>
> "wallaby" <notmyemail@no-spam> wrote in message
> news:PvvTa.10118$OM3.5098@no-spam
> > Redbaiter wrote:
> >
> > > http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/correspondent/1191203.stm
> >
> > Just look at the date on that:
> > Friday, 2 March, 2001, 23:52 GMT
> > yes i pasted it for you.
> >
>
>
> Expect to have a volley of childish insults hurled your way when redbaiter
> realizes his error.
>
Yawn.
You guys are such unbelievable morons.
Do the left always need every last little thing spelt out for
them????
This is a reference to the BBC's claim that Tony Blair's men
"sexed up" a report on WMD in Iraq, wherein if Blair is guilty of
this charge, what does this say about the BBC report made in
2001.????????
The whole point is to highlight the selectiveness of BBC
reporting and their hypocrisy on the Iraq WMD issue. Of course it
is dated 2001. That's the whole point, you insufferable boring
time wasting absolute dumbarse.
Honestly, so dumb. Just an utterly utterly utterly gob smacking
degree of idiocy..
--
Redbaiter
In the leftist's lexicon, the lowest of the low
In article <3f1e852f$1@no-spam>, don't@no-spam says...
>
>
> News-
>
> "In the wake of the US and British bombing of Iraq, investigative
> film maker Gwynne Roberts finds evidence that suggests that Iraq
> may already have developed its own nuclear weapons."
>
> Wow....
>
> Pretty scary report, isn't it?
>
> And can you guess where it aired?
>
> On the BBC, on March 3, 2001.
>
> Marxist Bush hating hypocrites caught out again...
>
> ======================================
>
> Saddam's bomb
> Friday, 2 March, 2001, 23:52 GMT
>
> Leone described himself as an engineer who was a member of the
> Iraqi Atomic Energy Commission - and a senior official in the
> secret Iraqi nuclear programme.
>
> To prove his expertise, Leone worked throughout the night drawing
> detailed diagrams of nuclear weapons in his hotel room.
>
> He said it worked on the principle of the Hiroshima-type bomb, in
> which high explosives drive pieces of highly enriched uranium
> together at high velocity. This triggers a nuclear explosion.
>
> Then Leone made another staggering claim - that Iraq had actually
> conducted a nuclear test before the Gulf War.
>
> "It was carried out at 1030 on 19 September 1989 at an
> underground site 150 kilometres south-west of Baghdad," he said.
>
> "Saddam had threatened us with the death penalty if we told
> anybody about it."
>
> The location was a militarised zone on the far shore of Lake
> Rezzaza, which used to be a tourist area. There is a natural
> tunnel there which leads to a large cavern under the lake.
>
> "We went to a lot of trouble to conceal the test from the eyes of
> the outside world," said . "The Russians supplied us with a table
> listing US satellite movements. They were always helping us."
"About 50 kilograms were sold to the Iraqis. The Americans gave the green
light for the deal."
Damn inconvenient isn't it, the US helped them to buy Uranium for this
supposed bomb.
Micheal Wilson says...
>
> "Redbaiter" <don't@no-spam> wrote in message
> news:3f1ef6a9@no-spam
> > Micheal Wilson says...
> > >
> > > "wallaby" <notmyemail@no-spam> wrote in message
> > > news:PvvTa.10118$OM3.5098@no-spam
> > > > Redbaiter wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/correspondent/1191203.stm
> > > >
> > > > Just look at the date on that:
> > > > Friday, 2 March, 2001, 23:52 GMT
> > > > yes i pasted it for you.
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Expect to have a volley of childish insults hurled your way when
> redbaiter
> > > realizes his error.
> > >
> > Yawn.
> >
> > You guys are such unbelievable morons.
> >
> > Do the left always need every last little thing spelt out for
> > them????
> >
> > This is a reference to the BBC's claim that Tony Blair's men
> > "sexed up" a report on WMD in Iraq, wherein if Blair is guilty of
> > this charge, what does this say about the BBC report made in
> > 2001.????????
> >
> > The whole point is to highlight the selectiveness of BBC
> > reporting and their hypocrisy on the Iraq WMD issue. Of course it
> > is dated 2001. That's the whole point, you insufferable boring
> > time wasting absolute dumbarse.
> >
> > Honestly, so dumb. Just an utterly utterly utterly gob smacking
> > degree of idiocy..
> >
>
>
> There you go. Can I predict this guy "redbaiter"'s moves or what?
>
>
> Mike
>
>
>
Why don't you try challenging his arguments. That is what usenet
is about you know. Its not really meant for spiteful children
like you to ponce around making personal comments about other
posters. The idea is to have something to say on the issue.
Poor little politically correct hurt liberal bore.
--
Redbaiter
In the leftist's lexicon, the lowest of the low
"Redbaiter" <don't@no-spam> wrote in message
news:3f203a17$1@no-spam
> Micheal Wilson says...
> >
> > "Redbaiter" <don't@no-spam> wrote in message
> > news:3f1ef6a9@no-spam
> > > Micheal Wilson says...
> > > >
> > > > "wallaby" <notmyemail@no-spam> wrote in message
> > > > news:PvvTa.10118$OM3.5098@no-spam
> > > > > Redbaiter wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/correspondent/1191203.stm
> > > > >
> > > > > Just look at the date on that:
> > > > > Friday, 2 March, 2001, 23:52 GMT
> > > > > yes i pasted it for you.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Expect to have a volley of childish insults hurled your way when
> > redbaiter
> > > > realizes his error.
> > > >
> > > Yawn.
> > >
> > > You guys are such unbelievable morons.
> > >
> > > Do the left always need every last little thing spelt out for
> > > them????
> > >
> > > This is a reference to the BBC's claim that Tony Blair's men
> > > "sexed up" a report on WMD in Iraq, wherein if Blair is guilty of
> > > this charge, what does this say about the BBC report made in
> > > 2001.????????
> > >
> > > The whole point is to highlight the selectiveness of BBC
> > > reporting and their hypocrisy on the Iraq WMD issue. Of course it
> > > is dated 2001. That's the whole point, you insufferable boring
> > > time wasting absolute dumbarse.
> > >
> > > Honestly, so dumb. Just an utterly utterly utterly gob smacking
> > > degree of idiocy..
> > >
> >
> >
> > There you go. Can I predict this guy "redbaiter"'s moves or what?
> >
> >
> > Mike
> >
> >
> >
> Why don't you try challenging his arguments. That is what usenet
> is about you know. Its not really meant for spiteful children
> like you to ponce around making personal comments about other
> posters. The idea is to have something to say on the issue.
>
> Poor little politically correct hurt liberal bore.
>
Why would I challenge his arguments? If you had any level of reading
comprehension, you'd have seen that I agreed with him.
Mike
