"Jon" <nospam@no-spam> wrote in message
news:010820030711090075%nospam@no-spam
> $37,000 for sex assault victim
>
> Date: July 31 2003
>
> A young woman who had oral sex performed on her by a man she mistakenly
> thought was her lover was yesterday awarded more than $37,000 in
> compensation.
>
> Philip Steven Corvo, 25, was jailed for four months after being found
> guilty in Brisbane District Court in February last year of two counts
> of sexual assault with circumstances of aggravation.
>
> Corvo had come home drunk and discovered the woman, whom he did not
> know, in his bed in an inner-city Brisbane suburb in November 1999.
>
> The woman, a 20-year-old public servant who had previously had sex with
> a friend of Corvo's in the bed, was asleep, and thought Corvo was the
> man with whom she had slept. When his friend returned, Corvo walked out
> of the room.
>
> At Corvo's trial, his lawyer said he had believed the woman was
> consenting to the sexual activity.
>
> Judge Michael Shanahan awarded the woman $37,500.
>
> Although she had virtually no physical injuries, psychiatric reports
> were tendered that said she had suffered post-traumatic stress disorder
> as a result of the assault.
>
> AAP
>
> <http://smh.com.au/text/articles/2003/07/30/1059480410721.htm>
>
> --
> Jon
They should have paid him the $37k. Following his mate in must have been a
bit tacky.
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2003 15:54:40 -0600
Jon wrote:
> $37,000 for sex assault victim
>
> Date: July 31 2003
>
> A young woman who had oral sex performed on her by a man she mistakenly
> thought was her lover was yesterday awarded more than $37,000 in
> compensation.
>
> Philip Steven Corvo, 25, was jailed for four months after being found
> guilty in Brisbane District Court in February last year of two counts
> of sexual assault with circumstances of aggravation.
>
> Corvo had come home drunk and discovered the woman, whom he did not
> know, in his bed in an inner-city Brisbane suburb in November 1999.
>
> The woman, a 20-year-old public servant who had previously had sex with
> a friend of Corvo's in the bed, was asleep, and thought Corvo was the
> man with whom she had slept. When his friend returned, Corvo walked out
> of the room.
>
> At Corvo's trial, his lawyer said he had believed the woman was
> consenting to the sexual activity.
>
> Judge Michael Shanahan awarded the woman $37,500.
>
> Although she had virtually no physical injuries, psychiatric reports
> were tendered that said she had suffered post-traumatic stress disorder
> as a result of the assault.
>
> AAP
>
> <http://smh.com.au/text/articles/2003/07/30/1059480410721.htm>
>
Let's get this straight. She's trespassing in HIS house, sleeping in
HIS, bed, and agrees to oral sex with him. So he's guilty of aggravated
sexual assault.
And he's drunk, unable to make an informed decision about sex. If a man
does sex with a drunk woman he's a "rapist" even if it was her idea. If
a woman does sex with a drunk man he's apparently a "rapist" despite her
active participation, and even if she invaded his home and bed. Total
bigoted double standard that destroys men. It's worse than a KKK
lynching.
This is another obvious case of the wrong party being convicted of
crime. Women=victim, man=villain. Shocking and shameful.
The Prosecuting attorney ought to be stoned. The judge ought to be
shot. The police ought to be run out of town on a rail.
It's time to storm the Bastille. Break out Lady G. We MEN have got some
work to do. Liberty, Equality, Fraternity!
Bob
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2003 17:31:42 -0600
Mr. F. Le Mur wrote:
> On Thu, 31 Jul 2003 21:13:46 GMT, Jon <nospam@no-spam> wrote:
>
> ->Although she had virtually no physical injuries, psychiatric reports
> ->were tendered that said she had suffered post-traumatic stress disorder
> ->as a result of the assault.
>
> Delicate flowers, each and every one.
>
>
Total sexism. No equal rights there at all.
The psychologists are whores too of course. They have no excuse to
continue their obviously unethical practice.
Bob
Mr. F. Le Mur (lemurama@no-spam writes:
> On Thu, 31 Jul 2003 21:13:46 GMT, Jon <nospam@no-spam> wrote:
>
> ->Although she had virtually no physical injuries, psychiatric reports
> ->were tendered that said she had suffered post-traumatic stress disorder
> ->as a result of the assault.
>
> Delicate flowers, each and every one.
Proof that women are not equal to men, and, as long as they keep
demaning such payouts, never will be.
By their own hands...
Andre
--
" I'm a man... But, I can change... If I have to... I guess. "
The Man Prayer, Red Green.
Leaves a nasty taste in your mouth hey
"Inver" <inver@no-spam> wrote in message
news:3f298e2a$0$26535$afc38c87@no-spam
>
> "Jon" <nospam@no-spam> wrote in message
> news:010820030711090075%nospam@no-spam
> > $37,000 for sex assault victim
> >
> > Date: July 31 2003
> >
> > A young woman who had oral sex performed on her by a man she mistakenly
> > thought was her lover was yesterday awarded more than $37,000 in
> > compensation.
> >
> > Philip Steven Corvo, 25, was jailed for four months after being found
> > guilty in Brisbane District Court in February last year of two counts
> > of sexual assault with circumstances of aggravation.
> >
> > Corvo had come home drunk and discovered the woman, whom he did not
> > know, in his bed in an inner-city Brisbane suburb in November 1999.
> >
> > The woman, a 20-year-old public servant who had previously had sex with
> > a friend of Corvo's in the bed, was asleep, and thought Corvo was the
> > man with whom she had slept. When his friend returned, Corvo walked out
> > of the room.
> >
> > At Corvo's trial, his lawyer said he had believed the woman was
> > consenting to the sexual activity.
> >
> > Judge Michael Shanahan awarded the woman $37,500.
> >
> > Although she had virtually no physical injuries, psychiatric reports
> > were tendered that said she had suffered post-traumatic stress disorder
> > as a result of the assault.
> >
> > AAP
> >
> > <http://smh.com.au/text/articles/2003/07/30/1059480410721.htm>
> >
> > --
> > Jon
>
> They should have paid him the $37k. Following his mate in must have been a
> bit tacky.
>
>
