Smee wrote:
>
> itsquitesimplereally@no-spam (StraightRight) wrote:
>
> >Now, don't get me wrong. I'm no gay hater. Personally, I don't give a
> >stuff where people stick their bits or their butts, as long as
> >everyone involved is happy about the *arrangements*.
>
> Ok then big boy, pull your jocks down, bend over, and let me make *you*
> happy :-)
I knew it. damn smee your looking like a bad biatch
>
> Smee
--
X-No-Archive: Yes
Do a who is Mr Atec
That was not smee's style of replying.
Just someone impersonating our Smee.
atec wrote:
>
> Smee wrote:
>
>>itsquitesimplereally@no-spam (StraightRight) wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Now, don't get me wrong. I'm no gay hater. Personally, I don't give a
>>>stuff where people stick their bits or their butts, as long as
>>>everyone involved is happy about the *arrangements*.
>>
>>Ok then big boy, pull your jocks down, bend over, and let me make *you*
>>happy :-)
>
> I knew it. damn smee your looking like a bad biatch
>
>>Smee
>
>
That would explain why I didn't see the post. Someone in my kill file
sent it. Name starting with B?
Moike
Todger wrote:
> Do a who is Mr Atec
> That was not smee's style of replying.
> Just someone impersonating our Smee.
>
> atec wrote:
>
>>
>> Smee wrote:
>>
>>> itsquitesimplereally@no-spam (StraightRight) wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Now, don't get me wrong. I'm no gay hater. Personally, I don't give a
>>>> stuff where people stick their bits or their butts, as long as
>>>> everyone involved is happy about the *arrangements*.
>>>
>>>
>>> Ok then big boy, pull your jocks down, bend over, and let me make *you*
>>> happy :-)
>>
>>
>> I knew it. damn smee your looking like a bad biatch
>>
>>> Smee
>>
>>
>>
I found it in aus.politics and xposted it..
I did not make the first post , check and see.
Moike wrote:
>
> That would explain why I didn't see the post. Someone in my kill file
> sent it. Name starting with B?
>
> Moike
>
> Todger wrote:
> > Do a who is Mr Atec
> > That was not smee's style of replying.
> > Just someone impersonating our Smee.
> >
> > atec wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> Smee wrote:
> >>
> >>> itsquitesimplereally@no-spam (StraightRight) wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> Now, don't get me wrong. I'm no gay hater. Personally, I don't give a
> >>>> stuff where people stick their bits or their butts, as long as
> >>>> everyone involved is happy about the *arrangements*.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Ok then big boy, pull your jocks down, bend over, and let me make *you*
> >>> happy :-)
> >>
> >>
> >> I knew it. damn smee your looking like a bad biatch
> >>
> >>> Smee
> >>
> >>
> >>
--
X-No-Archive: Yes
Yes well get your fuckin facts right
I didn't post it so you exposed a fake
Your apology is forthcoming.
don't believe me?
Check the headers
atec wrote:
> I found it in aus.politics and xposted it..
> I did not make the first post , check and see.
>
> Moike wrote:
>
>>That would explain why I didn't see the post. Someone in my kill file
>>sent it. Name starting with B?
>>
>>Moike
>>
>>Todger wrote:
>>
>>>Do a who is Mr Atec
>>>That was not smee's style of replying.
>>>Just someone impersonating our Smee.
>>>
>>>atec wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Smee wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>itsquitesimplereally@no-spam (StraightRight) wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>Now, don't get me wrong. I'm no gay hater. Personally, I don't give a
>>>>>>stuff where people stick their bits or their butts, as long as
>>>>>>everyone involved is happy about the *arrangements*.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Ok then big boy, pull your jocks down, bend over, and let me make *you*
>>>>>happy :-)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I knew it. damn smee your looking like a bad biatch
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Smee
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>
apology ? , were you aware of it before the xpost ?. did you a favour in
a back handed way .
SmeeR1100s wrote:
>
> Yes well get your fuckin facts right
> I didn't post it so you exposed a fake
> Your apology is forthcoming.
> don't believe me?
> Check the headers
>
> atec wrote:
>
> > I found it in aus.politics and xposted it..
> > I did not make the first post , check and see.
> >
> > Moike wrote:
> >
> >>That would explain why I didn't see the post. Someone in my kill file
> >>sent it. Name starting with B?
> >>
> >>Moike
> >>
> >>Todger wrote:
> >>
> >>>Do a who is Mr Atec
> >>>That was not smee's style of replying.
> >>>Just someone impersonating our Smee.
> >>>
> >>>atec wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>Smee wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>itsquitesimplereally@no-spam (StraightRight) wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>Now, don't get me wrong. I'm no gay hater. Personally, I don't give a
> >>>>>>stuff where people stick their bits or their butts, as long as
> >>>>>>everyone involved is happy about the *arrangements*.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>Ok then big boy, pull your jocks down, bend over, and let me make *you*
> >>>>>happy :-)
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> I knew it. damn smee your looking like a bad biatch
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>Smee
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >
--
X-No-Archive: Yes
I'm well aware of this person
He also impersonates others from this group.
I don't partake in aus.politics from this newsgroup so What I don't see
doesn't bother me.
atec wrote:
> apology ? , were you aware of it before the xpost ?. did you a favour in
> a back handed way .
>
> SmeeR1100s wrote:
>
>>Yes well get your fuckin facts right
>>I didn't post it so you exposed a fake
>>Your apology is forthcoming.
>>don't believe me?
>>Check the headers
>>
>>atec wrote:
>>
>>
>>>I found it in aus.politics and xposted it..
>>> I did not make the first post , check and see.
>>>
>>>Moike wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>That would explain why I didn't see the post. Someone in my kill file
>>>>sent it. Name starting with B?
>>>>
>>>>Moike
>>>>
>>>>Todger wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Do a who is Mr Atec
>>>>>That was not smee's style of replying.
>>>>>Just someone impersonating our Smee.
>>>>>
>>>>>atec wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>Smee wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>itsquitesimplereally@no-spam (StraightRight) wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Now, don't get me wrong. I'm no gay hater. Personally, I don't give a
>>>>>>>>stuff where people stick their bits or their butts, as long as
>>>>>>>>everyone involved is happy about the *arrangements*.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Ok then big boy, pull your jocks down, bend over, and let me make *you*
>>>>>>>happy :-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>I knew it. damn smee your looking like a bad biatch
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Smee
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>
impersonates you ?. sad really... ( shakes head as to why anyone would
copy a biatch)
SmeeR1100s wrote:
>
> I'm well aware of this person
> He also impersonates others from this group.
> I don't partake in aus.politics from this newsgroup so What I don't see
> doesn't bother me.
>
> atec wrote:
> > apology ? , were you aware of it before the xpost ?. did you a favour in
> > a back handed way .
> >
> > SmeeR1100s wrote:
> >
> >>Yes well get your fuckin facts right
> >>I didn't post it so you exposed a fake
> >>Your apology is forthcoming.
> >>don't believe me?
> >>Check the headers
> >>
> >>atec wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>I found it in aus.politics and xposted it..
> >>> I did not make the first post , check and see.
> >>>
> >>>Moike wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>That would explain why I didn't see the post. Someone in my kill file
> >>>>sent it. Name starting with B?
> >>>>
> >>>>Moike
> >>>>
> >>>>Todger wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>Do a who is Mr Atec
> >>>>>That was not smee's style of replying.
> >>>>>Just someone impersonating our Smee.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>atec wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>Smee wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>itsquitesimplereally@no-spam (StraightRight) wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>Now, don't get me wrong. I'm no gay hater. Personally, I don't give a
> >>>>>>>>stuff where people stick their bits or their butts, as long as
> >>>>>>>>everyone involved is happy about the *arrangements*.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>Ok then big boy, pull your jocks down, bend over, and let me make *you*
> >>>>>>>happy :-)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>I knew it. damn smee your looking like a bad biatch
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>Smee
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >
--
X-No-Archive: Yes
"atec" <"atec77(notspam)"@no-spam> wrote in message news:41119FC0.DD9B6216@no-spam
> impersonates you ?. sad really... ( shakes head as to why anyone would
> copy a biatch)
>
better than stalking one
smack wrote:
>
> "atec" <"atec77(notspam)"@no-spam> wrote in message news:41119FC0.DD9B6216@no-spam
> > impersonates you ?. sad really... ( shakes head as to why anyone would
> > copy a biatch)
> >
>
> better than stalking one
Ive never stalked anyone of value .
--
X-No-Archive: Yes
On 2004-08-05, atec <atec77(notspam)@no-spam> wrote:
> Ive never stalked anyone of value .
>
So you don't deny stalking Smee then
"Tim Moran" <tim-usenet@no-spam> wrote in message news:slrnch3un0.a27.tim-usenet@no-spam
> On 2004-08-05, atec <atec77(notspam)@no-spam> wrote:
> > Ive never stalked anyone of value .
> >
>
> So you don't deny stalking Smee then
hehe got him yessssssssssssssssss
smack wrote:
> "Tim Moran" <tim-usenet@no-spam> wrote in message news:slrnch3un0.a27.tim-usenet@no-spam
>
>>On 2004-08-05, atec <atec77(notspam)@no-spam> wrote:
>>
>>> Ive never stalked anyone of value .
>>>
>>
>>So you don't deny stalking Smee then
>
>
>
> hehe got him yessssssssssssssssss
>
>
But it was a fake Smee!!!!!!!!!!
I feel so cheap now.
*pouts*
"smack" <smack@no-spam> wrote in message
news:2neh7gF2jrU1@no-spam
> "Tim Moran" <tim-usenet@no-spam> wrote:
> > On 2004-08-05, atec <atec77(notspam)@no-spam> wrote:
> > > Ive never stalked anyone of value .
> > >
> > So you don't deny stalking Smee then
>
> hehe got him yessssssssssssssssss
>
As I posted today (but which seems to have disappeared into the ether);
I'd feel MORE concerned if he started "valuing" me than I am when he stalks
me!
Clem
(Although he seems to be focussing his little sick obsessing on Smee these
days instead)
Knobdoodle wrote:
> "smack" <smack@no-spam> wrote in message
> news:2neh7gF2jrU1@no-spam
>
>>"Tim Moran" <tim-usenet@no-spam> wrote:
>>
>>>On 2004-08-05, atec <atec77(notspam)@no-spam> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Ive never stalked anyone of value .
>>>>
>>>
>>>So you don't deny stalking Smee then
>>
>>hehe got him yessssssssssssssssss
>>
>
> As I posted today (but which seems to have disappeared into the ether);
> I'd feel MORE concerned if he started "valuing" me than I am when he stalks
> me!
> Clem
> (Although he seems to be focussing his little sick obsessing on Smee these
> days instead)
Even if he focused his obsession on a fake Smee?
this is getting worrying.
Tim Moran wrote:
>
> On 2004-08-05, atec <atec77(notspam)@no-spam> wrote:
> > Ive never stalked anyone of value .
> >
>
> So you don't deny stalking Smee then
is that your ay of asking if smee is valuable ?
if I meet him one day Ill make you the first to know.
--
X-No-Archive: Yes
SmeeR1100s wrote:
>
> smack wrote:
>
> > "Tim Moran" <tim-usenet@no-spam> wrote in message news:slrnch3un0.a27.tim-usenet@no-spam
> >
> >>On 2004-08-05, atec <atec77(notspam)@no-spam> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Ive never stalked anyone of value .
> >>>
> >>
> >>So you don't deny stalking Smee then
> >
> >
> >
> > hehe got him yessssssssssssssssss
> >
> >
>
> But it was a fake Smee!!!!!!!!!!
> I feel so cheap now.
> *pouts*
says a lot about the way some of your fellow posters consider you .
--
X-No-Archive: Yes
SmeeR1100s wrote:
>
> Knobdoodle wrote:
>
> > "smack" <smack@no-spam> wrote in message
> > news:2neh7gF2jrU1@no-spam
> >
> >>"Tim Moran" <tim-usenet@no-spam> wrote:
> >>
> >>>On 2004-08-05, atec <atec77(notspam)@no-spam> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Ive never stalked anyone of value .
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>So you don't deny stalking Smee then
> >>
> >>hehe got him yessssssssssssssssss
> >>
> >
> > As I posted today (but which seems to have disappeared into the ether);
> > I'd feel MORE concerned if he started "valuing" me than I am when he stalks
> > me!
> > Clem
> > (Although he seems to be focussing his little sick obsessing on Smee these
> > days instead)
>
> Even if he focused his obsession on a fake Smee?
> this is getting worrying.
wy ?. your not the attention center anymore ?. or is it just your self
perception is soundly deflated ?
--
X-No-Archive: Yes
"atec" <"atec77(notspam)"@no-spam> wrote in message news:41121AD0.2549A6EB@no-spam
>
>
> SmeeR1100s wrote:
> >
> > smack wrote:
> >
> > > "Tim Moran" <tim-usenet@no-spam> wrote in message news:slrnch3un0.a27.tim-usenet@no-spam
> > >
> > >>On 2004-08-05, atec <atec77(notspam)@no-spam> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Ive never stalked anyone of value .
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >>So you don't deny stalking Smee then
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > hehe got him yessssssssssssssssss
> > >
> > >
> >
> > But it was a fake Smee!!!!!!!!!!
> > I feel so cheap now.
> > *pouts*
> says a lot about the way some of your fellow posters consider you .
>
> --
> X-No-Archive: Yes
I was taking the piss out of you
smack wrote:
> "atec" <"atec77(notspam)"@no-spam> wrote in message news:41121AD0.2549A6EB@no-spam
>
>>
>>SmeeR1100s wrote:
>>
>>>smack wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>"Tim Moran" <tim-usenet@no-spam> wrote in message news:slrnch3un0.a27.tim-usenet@no-spam
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>On 2004-08-05, atec <atec77(notspam)@no-spam> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>Ive never stalked anyone of value .
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>So you don't deny stalking Smee then
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>hehe got him yessssssssssssssssss
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>But it was a fake Smee!!!!!!!!!!
>>>I feel so cheap now.
>>>*pouts*
>>
>> says a lot about the way some of your fellow posters consider you .
>>
>>--
>>X-No-Archive: Yes
>
> I was taking the piss out of you
>
>
>
soft target.
Moike
smack wrote:
>
> "atec" <"atec77(notspam)"@no-spam> wrote in message news:41121AD0.2549A6EB@no-spam
> >
> >
> > SmeeR1100s wrote:
> > >
> > > smack wrote:
> > >
> > > > "Tim Moran" <tim-usenet@no-spam> wrote in message news:slrnch3un0.a27.tim-usenet@no-spam
> > > >
> > > >>On 2004-08-05, atec <atec77(notspam)@no-spam> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>> Ive never stalked anyone of value .
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> > > >>So you don't deny stalking Smee then
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > hehe got him yessssssssssssssssss
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > But it was a fake Smee!!!!!!!!!!
> > > I feel so cheap now.
> > > *pouts*
> > says a lot about the way some of your fellow posters consider you .
yes that's correct , and I returned the favour , sarcasm abounds ,
should I do a :_)
now ?
> >
> > --
> > X-No-Archive: Yes
> I was taking the piss out of you
--
X-No-Archive: Yes
"atec" <"atec77(notspam)"@no-spam> wrote in message
news:41122348.FF14533A@no-spam
>
>
> smack wrote:
> >
> > "atec" <"atec77(notspam)"@no-spam> wrote in message
news:41121AD0.2549A6EB@no-spam
> > >
> > >
> > > SmeeR1100s wrote:
> > > >
> > > > smack wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > "Tim Moran" <tim-usenet@no-spam> wrote in message
news:slrnch3un0.a27.tim-usenet@no-spam
> > > > >
> > > > >>On 2004-08-05, atec <atec77(notspam)@no-spam> wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >>> Ive never stalked anyone of value .
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>So you don't deny stalking Smee then
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > hehe got him yessssssssssssssssss
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > But it was a fake Smee!!!!!!!!!!
> > > > I feel so cheap now.
> > > > *pouts*
> > > says a lot about the way some of your fellow posters consider you .
> yes that's correct , and I returned the favour , sarcasm abounds ,
> should I do a :_)
> now ?
>
Best save it for if you get a joke.
Clem
[PS: I was gonna straighten up the attributions but be fucked if I can tell
who wrote what and to whom/what he's actually responding...]
"smack" <smack@no-spam> wrote in message
news:2nel31F1nceU1@no-spam
>
> "atec" <"atec77(notspam)"@no-spam> wrote in message
news:41121AD0.2549A6EB@no-spam
> >
> >
> > SmeeR1100s wrote:
> > >
> > > smack wrote:
> > >
> > > > "Tim Moran" <tim-usenet@no-spam> wrote in message
news:slrnch3un0.a27.tim-usenet@no-spam
> > > >
> > > >>On 2004-08-05, atec <atec77(notspam)@no-spam> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>> Ive never stalked anyone of value .
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> > > >>So you don't deny stalking Smee then
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > hehe got him yessssssssssssssssss
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > But it was a fake Smee!!!!!!!!!!
> > > I feel so cheap now.
> > > *pouts*
> > says a lot about the way some of your fellow posters consider you .
> >
> > --
> > X-No-Archive: Yes
> I was taking the piss out of you
>