AJC <ajc@no-spam> wrote:
>On Thu, 23 Feb 2006 16:29:17 GMT, Mike <dontemailme@no-spam>
>wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 23 Feb 2006 16:55:16 +0100, AJC <ajc@no-spam> wrote:
>>
>>>On Thu, 23 Feb 2006 15:38:17 GMT, Mike <dontemailme@no-spam>
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Thu, 23 Feb 2006 14:45:44 +0100, AJC <ajc@no-spam> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Thu, 23 Feb 2006 12:23:01 GMT, Mike <dontemailme@no-spam>
>>>>>wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On Wed, 22 Feb 2006 21:30:21 GMT, "Mark C."
>>>>>><JimT_nospam@no-spam> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Leg room? We're talking about seat pitch.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>Leg room = Seat Pitch. Get it straight.
>>>>>
>>>>>Nonsense. Legroom is the amount of space available for one's legs,
>>>>>seat pitch refers to the distance between a point on one seat and the
>>>>>same point on the seat in front. The former relates to the comfort of
>>>>>the passenger, the latter relates to the capacity of the aircraft. By
>>>>>the use of thinner seat backs some airlines offer greater legroom than
>>>>>others for the same seat pitch.
>>>>>
>>>>>--==++AJC++==--
>>>>Yes, a thinner seat can increase legroom without increasing the seat
>>>>pitch, but generally increase or decrease the legroom by changing the
>>>>seat pitch. This is far from nonsense.
>>>
>>>You've just made the point yourself. To say legroom = seat pitch is
>>>nonsense. Try saying that there is generally a relationship between
>>>the two.
>>>--==++AJC++==--
>>Pardon me for my poor choice of words. While seat pitch does not
>>exactly equal leg room, the amount of legrom is more related to seat
>>pitch than to any other factor.
>
>
>If you are going to tell another poster to 'get it straight', it would
>help if you understood what you were telling him to get straight.
>--==++AJC++==--
Damn, you Dutch homosexuals are so neurotic!
Try a smaller buttplug. Breathe deep, relax your sphincter.....
